Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?

From: "Gregory W Burnham" <gburnham(at)sfu(dot)ca>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Gene Selkov Jr(dot)" <selkovjr(at)mcs(dot)anl(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
Date: 1999-02-01 12:01:21
Message-ID: 00cc01be4dda$9660fb20$8d0835d1@bconnected.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

>> Right. That would be a place where you couldn't use Matthew's
>> suggestion. But in my case my 'client' is, ultimately, a cgi.
>> And now I'm wondering, why am I not using files? I would hope
>> that postgres would be providing me with some kind of superior
>> performance than the file system. Infact, I've always assumed
>> it. But was I right to assume that? Are there benchmarks out
>> there?
>
>No benchmarks are needed. Large objects are stored one per file,
>therefore you will see the same preformance.

Ok, I've seen all the xinv* files, I understand that. But what
if the benefit of using large objects over files? If there isn't
superior performance then why do it?

Gregory W Burnham
Software Engineer
Excite Labs
Faculty Of Education
Simon Fraser University
Vancouver, BC, V5A 1S6
604 291 3615 (ph)
604 291 5679 (fx)

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-02-01 13:26:09 Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
Previous Message Valerio Santinelli 1999-02-01 12:00:03 ODBC Locking troubles