From: | "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
Date: | 2000-10-12 14:21:11 |
Message-ID: | 00c701c03457$ac4b77c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
May bad... sometimes it is too easy assuming everything open source is GPL.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] My new job
> Adam Lang wrote:
> > (Actually, under GPL, any modifications of the code have to be free
also,
> > correct?, so it can't really be proprietised unless they make an add-on
that
> > is private... but then postgres can be run and compiled without it).
>
> PostgreSQL is not under the GPL. PostgreSQL has (and always had) a BSD
> license -- which means there is no license restriction on
> 'proprietizing' PostgreSQL code.
>
> > But, as many others have said, the core team seems to have a good hold
on
> > reality and their ethics, so it probably won't come to an issue. :)
>
> This is the real safeguard.
>
> --
> Lamar Owen
> WGCR Internet Radio
> 1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bmccoy | 2000-10-12 14:26:40 | Re: Re: R: PostgreSQL book |
Previous Message | Jeff Eckermann | 2000-10-12 14:18:52 | RE: Index on substring? |