Re: Recomended FS

From: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
To: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
Cc: "Nick Burrett" <nick(at)dsvr(dot)net>, "postgresql" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Date: 2003-10-20 13:09:35
Message-ID: 00c501c3970b$6900f250$0500a8c0@canaan.co.il
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: "Nick Burrett" <nick(at)dsvr(dot)net>; "postgresql"
<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS

> Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>
> >>I'm saying: don't expect your DB performance to come on leaps and bounds
> >>just because you changed to a different filesystem format. If you've
> >>got speed problems then it might help to look elsewhere first.
> >>
> >
> > I dont expect miracles :)
> > but still i have to choose one,so why shouldnt i choose the one which
best
> > fit ?
>
> All things being equal, you should optimise your application design and
database
> tuning before you choose file system.
>
> If a thing works well for you, with a better file system it will just work
> better. That's the point.
>

I agree, but still ill have to choose an FS, does the list have any opinion
on what FS to choose ?

> Shridhar
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-20 13:12:44 Re: ShmemAlloc errors
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-10-20 13:06:53 Re: Recomended FS