Re: GT.M database open sourced

From: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
To: "PGSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GT.M database open sourced
Date: 2000-11-14 14:25:47
Message-ID: 00c501c04e46$c80dd1c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I believe GPL says you can do whatever the hell you want with the code, you
just can't license it yourself.
So I would ASSUME if you took the initiative to port it to RS/6000, it would
be free to the community and Sanchez couldn't do anything about it.... of
course they could still make money off support contracts for it.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Roboul" <igor(at)raduga(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "PGSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] GT.M database open sourced

> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:09:13AM -0500, Adam Lang wrote:
> > Basically they are looking for the community to code and test the x86
> > version, and they will port code and fixes to their other platforms to
sell.
> > It seems like an attempt at downsizing the development team. ;)
> Also, they say that license is GPL. Does GPL restrict porting to other
> architectures?
>
> --
> Igor Roboul, Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga",
> Sochi, Russia
> http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jules Bean 2000-11-14 14:44:40 Re: Is this proper UNION behavior??
Previous Message Adam Lang 2000-11-14 14:22:36 XML