Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test

It seems to me file system journaling should fix the whole problem by giving
you a record of what was actually commited to disk and what was not. I must
not understand journaling correctly. Can anyone explain to me how
journaling works.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: <mikeb(at)netnation(dot)com>
Cc: "Stephen" <jleelim(at)xxxxxx(dot)com>; <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SCSI vs. IDE performance test

> Mike Benoit wrote:
> > I just ran some benchmarks against a 10K SCSI drive and 7200 RPM IDE
> > drive here:
> >
> > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> >
> > The results vary quite a bit, and it seems the file system you use
> > can make a huge difference.
> >
> > SCSI is obviously faster, but a 20% performance gain for 5x the cost is
> > only worth it for a very small percentage of people, I would think.
>
> Did you turn off the IDE write cache? If not, the SCSI drive is
> reliable in case of OS failure, while the IDE is not.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>