From: | "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "'Marin Dimitrov'" <marin(dot)dimitrov(at)sirma(dot)bg>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] JDBC-Question |
Date: | 2002-03-14 12:57:43 |
Message-ID: | 00bc01c1cb57$d4df45c0$0b01a8c0@inspiron |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Actually, at the moment the driver gets all the result set at once, so
no setFetchSize() isn't implemented.
However you can get a cursor back and scroll through the result set
yourself
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marin Dimitrov
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:55 AM
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [GENERAL] JDBC-Question
>
> Do I have all the data (1000 rows) in memory or dose the driver fetch
> the data as needed (while iterating over the rset instance) from my
> postgresql backend.
>
since I would expect that the driver retrieves the result sets in chunks
I'd like to know if this behaviour can be controlled - i.e. is
setFetchSize() implemented?
thanx,
Marin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William C Brennan | 2002-03-14 12:58:54 | Re: Postgres on Apple hardware? |
Previous Message | Marin Dimitrov | 2002-03-14 11:54:44 | Re: [GENERAL] JDBC-Question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kovács Péter | 2002-03-14 13:58:59 | Re: measure of JDBC performances |
Previous Message | Marin Dimitrov | 2002-03-14 11:54:44 | Re: [GENERAL] JDBC-Question |