Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Richard Tucker" <richt(at)multera(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hacker" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Date: 2002-08-03 10:13:38
Message-ID: 00ba01c23ad6$700e8f90$0200a8c0@SOL
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The main area where it seems to get heavy use is during index builds,
> and for 'CREATE TABLE AS SELECT...'.
>
> So I will remove the local buffer manager as part of the PITR patch,
> unless there is further objection.

Would someone mind filling me in as to what the local bugger manager is and
how it is different (and not useful) compared to the shared buffer manager?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-03 11:32:10 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-03 10:07:50 Re: []performance issues