Re: Re: MySQL has transactions

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)venux(dot)net>
To: "Lincoln Yeoh" <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: MySQL has transactions
Date: 2001-01-25 15:02:29
Message-ID: 00ba01c086df$d6934aa0$0200000a@windows
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> When Postgresql 6.5 came out it, it was VERY MUCH better ( many many
thanks
> to the developers and all involved). And I'm waiting for a solid 7.1 to
fix
> that <8KB issue.

Technically..

<= BLCKSZ (can be up to 32k)

I've been using PostgreSQL with a 32k BLCKSZ since 7.0 (on a productions
server) and haven't had a problem one..

-Mitch

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2001-01-25 15:28:01 Re: Re: 7.1 expected features list?
Previous Message bpalmer 2001-01-25 14:42:45 Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfonso Peniche 2001-01-25 15:46:14 serial values and odbc
Previous Message dom 2001-01-25 14:49:03 Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)