Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports

From: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com>
To: "Matthew Kirkwood" <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date: 2002-05-08 17:43:13
Message-ID: 00b801c1f6b7$d48b46b0$22c30191@comm.mot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Can you be more specific? What required syntax? I was talking about named
pipe vs UDS socket...

> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>
> > Just a friendly reminder that it should be named pipe rather than UDS
> > ;)
>
> Named pipes don't have the required syntax. Perhaps for
> platforms which have neither SysV shm, something like
> POSIX named semaphores are the way forward.
>
> Matthew.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-05-08 18:49:39 Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Previous Message Andrew Pimlott 2002-05-08 17:35:12 Re: non-standard escapes in string literals