Re: RE: xlog loose ends, continued

From: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: xlog loose ends, continued
Date: 2001-03-13 16:39:52
Message-ID: 00b801c0abdc$3ae4c580$4c79583f@sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > StartUpID counts database startups and so has timestamp characteristics.
> > Actually, idea is to use SUI in future to allow reusing XIDs after startup: seeing
> > old SUI in data pages we'll know that all transaction on this page was committed
> > "long ago" (ie visible from MVCC POV). This requires UNDO, of course.
>
> First thanx for the description, but db startup would only count to 5-7 per year :-),
> is that sufficient ? It hardly sounds like anything useful to include in page header.

It will be sufficient if DB will not use all 2^32 XIDs without shutdown.
Removing pg_log *segments* for old XIDs is another story.

> What about the xlog id, that is also used for xlog file name, but I still think a xid would
> be the best candidate.

logid would be ok too, xid is not - we have to shorten xids lifetime in near future.

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-03-13 16:57:17 AW: RE: xlog loose ends, continued
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-13 16:37:40 Re: Performance monitor