From: | "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | sorry for the repeats - no spam intended :-) |
Date: | 2001-06-07 05:20:02 |
Message-ID: | 00b001c0ef11$81e53aa0$0705a8c0@jecw2k1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> representation of a system object name?
>
> What if I rename the get_seq_name function and move it to
> backend/utils/adt/name.c (and of course change the references to it in
> sequence.c)? Actually, now I'm wondering why nameout doesn't downcase and
> truncate.
>
> -- Joe
Yikes! Sorry about sending that last message 3 times -- I guess that's what
I get for using an evil mail client ;-)
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martín Marqués | 2001-06-07 06:26:52 | Re: [HACKERS] something smells bad |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2001-06-07 05:09:35 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2001-06-07 13:10:45 | Re: take 2: show all / reset all |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2001-06-07 05:09:35 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |