From: | "Dave Cramer" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver |
Date: | 2001-11-05 19:59:43 |
Message-ID: | 00af01c16634$6957d160$8201a8c0@inspiron |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Umm ok,
This is dissappointing; kind of defeats the purpose of being able to
leverage open source code for the good of all open source projects. It
isn't that big a deal, we can write our own logging package.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
Sent: November 5, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Dave Cramer
Cc: 'Bruce Momjian'; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Licensing issues including another projects
source code into the jdbc driver
Dave Cramer writes:
> I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with
> this clause?
It would require everyone that ships a product based on the JDBC driver
to
mention this acknowledgement in advertisements, which is annoying and
impractical. More generally, it would introduce a divergence in
licensing
in PostgreSQL, which should be avoided.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-11-05 20:00:39 | Re: compiler warnings in ODBC |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-05 19:20:04 | Re: Proposal: 7.2b2 today |