Re: Sort

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)venux(dot)net>
To: "Nathan Barnett" <nbarnett(at)cellularphones(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sort
Date: 2000-07-21 18:48:26
Message-ID: 00aa01bff344$41016780$4100000a@doot
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Show the query and maybe someone could help :-)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Barnett" <nbarnett(at)cellularphones(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 2:33 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Sort

> I'm currently using v7.0.2 of PostgreSQL.
>
> I have a query that performs a group by on three columns. The EXPLAIN of
> the query is as follows:
>
> Aggregate (cost=4116.05..4125.47 rows=94 width=24)
> -> Group (cost=4116.05..4123.12 rows=942 width=24)
> -> Sort (cost=4116.05..4116.05 rows=942 width=24)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..4069.52 rows=942 width=24)
> -> Seq Scan on click (cost=0.00..15.42 rows=942
> width=8)
> -> Index Scan using impression_pkey on impression
> (cost=0.00..4.29 rows=1 width=16)
>
> I need to speed up this query. I have already created an index on the
three
> columns query_idx(columna, columnb,columnc). Is there some other index
that
> I could add which would speed up the query. There is a high frequency in
> the table of each group. Each group probably makes up 10% of the table.
> Does this force a sequence scan when sorting and grouping? Basically just
> looking for suggestions.
>
>
> ----------------
> Nathan Barnett
>
>

In response to

  • Sort at 2000-07-21 18:33:44 from Nathan Barnett

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitch Vincent 2000-07-21 19:03:18 Re: Sort
Previous Message Nathan Barnett 2000-07-21 18:33:44 Sort