From: | "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)venux(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Nathan Barnett" <nbarnett(at)cellularphones(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sort |
Date: | 2000-07-21 18:48:26 |
Message-ID: | 00aa01bff344$41016780$4100000a@doot |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Show the query and maybe someone could help :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Barnett" <nbarnett(at)cellularphones(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 2:33 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Sort
> I'm currently using v7.0.2 of PostgreSQL.
>
> I have a query that performs a group by on three columns. The EXPLAIN of
> the query is as follows:
>
> Aggregate (cost=4116.05..4125.47 rows=94 width=24)
> -> Group (cost=4116.05..4123.12 rows=942 width=24)
> -> Sort (cost=4116.05..4116.05 rows=942 width=24)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..4069.52 rows=942 width=24)
> -> Seq Scan on click (cost=0.00..15.42 rows=942
> width=8)
> -> Index Scan using impression_pkey on impression
> (cost=0.00..4.29 rows=1 width=16)
>
> I need to speed up this query. I have already created an index on the
three
> columns query_idx(columna, columnb,columnc). Is there some other index
that
> I could add which would speed up the query. There is a high frequency in
> the table of each group. Each group probably makes up 10% of the table.
> Does this force a sequence scan when sorting and grouping? Basically just
> looking for suggestions.
>
>
> ----------------
> Nathan Barnett
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitch Vincent | 2000-07-21 19:03:18 | Re: Sort |
Previous Message | Nathan Barnett | 2000-07-21 18:33:44 | Sort |