From: | "Mel Jamero" <mel(at)gmanmi(dot)tv> |
---|---|
To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "'Lee Matthews'" <Lee_Matthews(at)pa(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGSQL vs. SQL Server questions |
Date: | 2003-06-12 08:02:16 |
Message-ID: | 009901c330b8$f1122600$1b06a8c0@CMPMEL |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Hi Lee,
Josh's reply was very insightful indeed... =) Anyway, as for your last
question:
Yes, there's and ODBC compliant driver for PostgreSQL and it's been working
fine for us, at least in the last 2 years. (XP, NT, 2000, '98, Red Hat
Linux)
And yes, you simply need to vary the connection string to connect to either
SQL Server or Postgres.
HTH.
>> Is an OBDC compliant driver for PGSQL that will enable my COM objects to
>> work against both PGSQL and SQL Server by merely varying the connection
>> string?
>I can't answer that one; Postgres has an ODBC driver, but how smoothly you
can
>transition your COM objects depends on too many factors to count. I
suggest
>that you test it.
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-novice-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-novice-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:25 AM
To: Lee Matthews; 'pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] PGSQL vs. SQL Server questions
<-- snipped -->
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dani Oderbolz | 2003-06-12 08:07:28 | Re: PGSQL vs. SQL Server questions |
Previous Message | Dani Oderbolz | 2003-06-12 07:50:34 | Re: Question regarding keyword checkboxes in database |