From: | "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "'Barry Lind'" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |
Date: | 2001-06-27 17:42:38 |
Message-ID: | 009101c0ff30$8efd1e40$0201a8c0@INSPIRON |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
As a first cut I agree, however things will change in the future, and we
should put the code in to deal with future, and past differences.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Lind [mailto:barry(at)xythos(dot)com]
Sent: June 27, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
Dave,
I personaly don't think it is worth the time to make this work correctly
against a 7.0 database. I think we should focus on fixing this for 7.1
first. Then later see if it still makes sense to work on getting 7.0
support done.
thanks,
--Barry
Dave Cramer wrote:
> Barry,
>
> The getXXXFunctions aren't implemented
> Some of the other functions are correct for version 7.1 but not for
> previous versions. Ie. The row length, etc. I think the driver should
> get the version and determine what is correct for each version.
>
> I think this is incorrect.
> public boolean supportsSelectForUpdate() throws SQLException
> {
> // XXX-Not Implemented
> return false;
> }
>
> There are a number of things here which are hard coded, and possible
> wrong.
>
> I started to work on this, but since I am going on vacation next week
I
> have a number of fires to get down to a slow burn before I go.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Lind [mailto:barry(at)xythos(dot)com]
> Sent: June 26, 2001 9:22 PM
> To: Dave Cramer
> Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
>
> Dave,
>
> Can you give a little more detail on what you mean by 'Improved
> DatabaseMetaData'? What specific areas are currently lacking?
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
>
>
>>>On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:56:18PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have to agree, we need to compile a todo list.
>>>>
>>>>Mine would include:
>>>>
>>>>1) Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
>>>>2) Updateable resultSet
>>>>3) Improved DatabaseMetaData
>>>>4) Compatible blob support
>>>>
>>>>
>>Added to official PostgreSQL TODO:
>>
>>* JDBC
>> * Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
>> * Updateable resultSet
>> * Improved DatabaseMetaData
>> * Compatible blob support
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:51:30 | Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:33:44 | Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:51:30 | Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:34:53 | [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:51:30 | Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2001-06-27 17:33:44 | Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) |