From: | "Arsalan Zaidi" <azaidi(at)directi(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Fw: Speed diff cause by multi-byte support |
Date: | 2002-03-28 06:24:10 |
Message-ID: | 008901c1d621$2f32ae80$4301a8c0@directi.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Reposting...
Sorry about being so insistent, but I'd really like to know! :-)
--Arsalan.
----- Original Message -----
From: Arsalan Zaidi <azaidi(at)directi(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:52 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Speed diff cause by multi-byte support
> Hi.
>
> I read somewhere in the docs that turning on multi-byte support slows PG
> down.
>
> I was wondering. If I compile multi-byte support in and then use PG to
> access
> both a db initdb'ed with supprot for UNICODE and another one which uses
> plain
> ASCII, will there be a difference in speed between the two?
>
> Will PG run as normal with the ASCII db and slower with the UNICODE db or
> slower with both?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --Arsalan.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> People often hate those things which they do not know, or cannot
understand.
> --Ali Ibn Abi Talib (A.S.)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas T. Thai | 2002-03-28 06:53:32 | PHP, PgSQL, stale Persistent connection |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-03-28 06:09:49 | Re: Why won't the query planner use my index? |