| From: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hardware Config |
| Date: | 2001-06-21 08:53:47 |
| Message-ID: | 008501c0fa2f$affeeb60$1001a8c0@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
From: "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>
> > > Will PostgreSQL take advantage of more than 1 CPU? If so, are there
> any
> > > benchmarks showing how it scales with multiple CPUs?
>
> We run PG on a quad xeon, and it works wonderfully. From PG's design
> of forking off a new backend for each connection, it is inherantly
> scalable, as each backend can run on another CPU. And, of course, having
> extra CPU's to handle kernel code, I/O, interrupts, and other things is
> always good.
Although the original poster should know that it won't spread the cost of
one large query over several CPU's (which I believe Oracle can be made to
do).
- Richard Huxton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tillea | 2001-06-21 09:13:33 | Authentification |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2001-06-21 08:49:16 | Re: Postgres is too slow? |