From: | Matteo Sgalaberni <sgala(at)sgala(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations |
Date: | 2011-12-30 16:01:00 |
Message-ID: | 00842f17-90cb-4154-8be0-a49379514739@zimbra1.ovus.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
I have a two tables that are partitioned by month.
I have different results for the same query (query A/query B), the only thing that differ from A and B is the customer id.
Query A:
SELECT sms.id AS id_sms
FROM
sms_messaggio AS sms,
sms_messaggio_dlr AS dlr
WHERE sms.id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio
AND sms.timestamp_todeliver >= '1/3/2010'::timestamp
AND sms.timestamp_todeliver < '30/4/2010'::timestamp
AND dlr.timestamp_todeliver >= '1/3/2010'::timestamp
AND dlr.timestamp_todeliver < '30/4/2010'::timestamp
AND sms.id_cliente = '13'
ORDER BY dlr.timestamp_todeliver DESC LIMIT 50;
PLAN:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.02..943.11 rows=50 width=16) (actual time=0.616..83.103 rows=50 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.02..107279143.34 rows=5687651 width=16) (actual time=0.615..83.045 rows=50 loops=1)
Join Filter: (sms.id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio)
-> Merge Append (cost=0.02..20289460.70 rows=5687651 width=16) (actual time=0.046..15.379 rows=5874 loops=1)
Sort Key: dlr.timestamp_todeliver
-> Index Scan Backward using sms_messaggio_dlr_todeliver on sms_messaggio_dlr dlr (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Index Scan Backward using sms_messaggio_dlr_timestamp_todeliver_201003 on sms_messaggio_dlr_201003 dlr (cost=0.00..12428664.98 rows=3502530 width=16) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Index Scan Backward using sms_messaggio_dlr_timestamp_todeliver_201004 on sms_messaggio_dlr_201004 dlr (cost=0.00..7756421.17 rows=2185120 width=16) (actual time=0.023..8.458 rows=5874 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Append (cost=0.00..15.26 rows=3 width=8) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=5874)
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_pkey1 on sms_messaggio sms (cost=0.00..0.28 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=5874)
Index Cond: (id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio)
Filter: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (id_cliente = 13))
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_201003_pkey on sms_messaggio_201003 sms (cost=0.00..7.54 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=5874)
Index Cond: (id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio)
Filter: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (id_cliente = 13))
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_201004_pkey on sms_messaggio_201004 sms (cost=0.00..7.45 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=5874)
Index Cond: (id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio)
Filter: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (id_cliente = 13))
Total runtime: 83.201 ms
Query B:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT sms.id AS id_sms,
dlr.msisdn,
to_char(dlr.timestamp_stato,'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') AS timestamp_stato,
dlr.stato,
dlr.id AS id_dlr,
dlr.numero_pdu,
dlr.costo_cli
FROM
sms_messaggio AS sms,
sms_messaggio_dlr AS dlr
WHERE sms.id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio
AND sms.timestamp_todeliver >= '1/3/2010'::timestamp
AND sms.timestamp_todeliver < '30/4/2010'::timestamp
AND dlr.timestamp_todeliver >= '1/3/2010'::timestamp
AND dlr.timestamp_todeliver < '30/4/2010'::timestamp
AND sms.id_cliente = '7'
ORDER BY dlr.timestamp_todeliver ASC LIMIT 50;
PLAN:
Limit (cost=0.02..78345.78 rows=50 width=54) (actual time=8852.661..269509.298 rows=50 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.02..58256338.38 rows=37179 width=54) (actual time=8852.658..269509.225 rows=50 loops=1)
Join Filter: (sms.id = dlr.id_sms_messaggio)
-> Merge Append (cost=0.02..20289460.70 rows=5687651 width=54) (actual time=0.067..4016.421 rows=1568544 loops=1)
Sort Key: dlr.timestamp_todeliver
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_dlr_todeliver on sms_messaggio_dlr dlr (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=101) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_dlr_timestamp_todeliver_201003 on sms_messaggio_dlr_201003 dlr (cost=0.00..12428664.98 rows=3502530 width=54) (actual time=0.030..2405.200 rows=1568544 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_dlr_timestamp_todeliver_201004 on sms_messaggio_dlr_201004 dlr (cost=0.00..7756421.17 rows=2185120 width=55) (actual time=0.028..0.028 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Materialize (cost=0.00..1715.42 rows=445 width=8) (actual time=0.001..0.080 rows=161 loops=1568544)
-> Append (cost=0.00..1713.20 rows=445 width=8) (actual time=0.034..0.337 rows=161 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on sms_messaggio sms (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=1)
Filter: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (id_cliente = 7))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on sms_messaggio_201003 sms (cost=6.85..1199.49 rows=313 width=8) (actual time=0.032..0.122 rows=94 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (id_cliente = 7)
Filter: ((timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on sms_messaggio_id_cliente_201003 (cost=0.00..6.78 rows=313 width=0) (actual time=0.022..0.022 rows=94 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id_cliente = 7)
-> Index Scan using sms_messaggio_id_cliente_timestamp_201004 on sms_messaggio_201004 sms (cost=0.00..513.71 rows=131 width=8) (actual time=0.016..0.072 rows=67 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((id_cliente = 7) AND (timestamp_todeliver >= '2010-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (timestamp_todeliver < '2010-04-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
Total runtime: 269510.002 ms
I'm using pg 9.1
Can someone explain me why the planner do this?
Thanks
Matteo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Mirosław | 2011-12-30 16:23:25 | Re: partitioned table: differents plans, slow on some situations |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-12-29 16:51:21 | Re: parse - bind take more time than execute |