Re: Providing libpq explicitly

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Talha Bin Rizwan <talha(dot)rizwan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Providing libpq explicitly
Date: 2016-10-11 01:59:26
Message-ID: 00796832-f6b7-ef8c-4c5f-6c5e09efc89f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum

On 10/10/16 2:44 AM, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> For 3rd party apps that depend on specific version of libpq (I mean like "libpq
>> >= 9.1", not libpq.so.5) are broken now. Would you mind if I put it back to the
> community RPMs?

What is an example of such a package?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2016-10-11 07:13:53 Re: Providing libpq explicitly
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-10-10 11:45:36 Re: Providing libpq explicitly