Re: Serial not so unique?

From: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: <srn(at)commsecure(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Serial not so unique?
Date: 2001-08-18 13:17:17
Message-ID: 007401c127e8$1ab351e0$0705a8c0@jecw2k1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Sometimes (about 20%, it seems) with several of the data sets, we
> get an error trying to insert rows into the table with the serial in it.
> On investigation, it seems that the serial number has got to 101, then
> set itself back to 4, causing nextval to return 5, and there are already
> entries from 1-101.
>
> Now, we use the serial as the primary key, and we never explicitly set it.
>
> Has anyone seen anything like this? I can work around it by generating
> a serial number within the application, but that's not ideal.

Odd problem. What do you get if you run:
select * from name_of_this_troublesome_sequence;
particularly for increment_by, max_value, min_value, and is_cycled?

-- Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-18 14:40:33 Re: Serial not so unique?
Previous Message Stephen Robert Norris 2001-08-18 05:55:28 Serial not so unique?