From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI'" <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fast promotion failure |
Date: | 2013-05-10 11:00:40 |
Message-ID: | 006e01ce4d6d$9c8503a0$d58f0ae0$@kapila@huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, May 10, 2013 2:07 PM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Thank you for noticing me of that.
>
> > It seems to me, it is the same problem as discussed and fixed in
> below
> > thread.
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51894942.4080500@vmware.com
> >
> > Could you try with fixes given by heikki.
>
> The first one settles the timeline transition problem for the
> present. Besides, I have no longer found any recovery failure
> except unrepeatable one shown below.
>
> > C 2013-05-10 15:30:29.589 JST 9242 LOG: restarted WAL streaming at
> 0/5000000 on timeline 2
> > B 2013-05-10 15:30:33.789 JST 9233 LOG: restartpoint complete:
> (snip.)
> > B 2013-05-10 15:30:33.789 JST 9233 LOG: recovery restart point at
> 0/3000028
> > B 2013-05-10 15:30:33.789 JST 9233 LOG: checkpoint starting:
> > C 2013-05-10 15:32:32.170 JST 9242 FATAL: could not receive data
> from WAL stream:
Is there any chance, that there is any network glitch caused this one time
error.
> I'm get confused, the patch seems to me ensureing the "first
> checkpoint after fast promotion is performed" to use the
> "correct, new, ThisTimeLineID".
What is your confusion?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-10 11:25:35 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade fails, "mismatch of relation OID" - 9.1.9 to 9.2.4 |
Previous Message | Vitalii Tymchyshyn | 2013-05-10 10:48:49 | Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |