Re: Corrupted tables?

From: "Mihai Gheorghiu" <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Corrupted tables?
Date: 2001-08-01 16:00:49
Message-ID: 006d01c11aa3$24e89be0$6e646464@New6.Travel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'll try. Thanks a lot.

Mihai

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mihai Gheorghiu <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Corrupted tables?

>"Mihai Gheorghiu" <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net> writes:
>> I double-checked:
>> - It is the tables that were included in the MSAccess querry that can no
>> longer be accessed by MSAccess.
>> - The tables in question can be viewed with psql and PGAccess.
>
>Well, if you can read the tables with psql then they're not "broken".
>It sounds like the problem must be on the MSAccess side --- does
>MSAccess have any persistent state that you can reset? (preferences
>file maybe?)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-01 16:04:24 Re: Re: Better backtrace (wasRe: pqReadData() -- backend closed the ch
Previous Message Susan Lane 2001-08-01 15:52:39 Re: creating postgres tables using existing table defs