From: | "Jason Watkins" <jason_watkins(at)pobox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "postgres list" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: read this and puke |
Date: | 2002-06-15 19:24:18 |
Message-ID: | 006401c214a2$3ec1f030$426f2a40@boondock |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The other thing I'd say is, making the debate MySQL vs PostgreSQL is picking
a battle on 2 fronts.
It would be better to present a unified front of options from OSS for
database needs. Have a dead simple info store, something that needs to back
something simplistic that is predominately read only? Go MySQL. Have a true
application with complex business rules, PosgreSQL will get you there.
I think this is the way most people end up viewing them. Even tho I consider
PostgreSQL fast enough for even simple needs.
And of course, getting replication and fallover going would really
strengthen Postgre's case. I feel bad saying that without being able to
contrib code tho.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-06-15 19:26:39 | Re: Is md5 really more secure than crypt? |
Previous Message | Jason Watkins | 2002-06-15 19:16:40 | Re: read this and puke |