Re: "make report"

From: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "make report"
Date: 2002-04-24 18:19:22
Message-ID: 006001c1ebbc$8f9f8620$22c30191@comm.mot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It depends. QNX4 may be used with GCC, in which case it does have long long.
I am not sure if that combination will play along with Postgres, but it
should not be assumed impossible.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "make report"

> Thomas Lockhart writes:
>
> > Right. The two areas which come to mind are integer availability and the
> > timezone support (as you might know we support *three* different time
> > zone models). At the moment, none of the developers know the features
> > supported on the platforms we claim to support. Which platforms do not
> > have int8 support still?
>
> "Still" is the wrong word. There used to be platforms with certain areas
> of trouble, and those platforms don't go away.
>
> But since you asked: QNX 4 and SCO OpenServer are known to lack 8 byte
> integers.
>
> > Which do not have time zone interfaces fitting
> > into the two "zonefull" styles? I'd like to know, but istm that the
> > people *with* the platforms could do this much more easily than those
> > without. What am I missing here??
>
> I don't think polling users this way will yield reliable results. If you
> really want to find out, break something and see if someone complains.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-04-24 18:20:23 Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-24 18:14:29 Re: "make report"