Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks?

From: "Maurice Gittens" <mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl>
To: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
Cc: <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks?
Date: 1998-02-13 11:51:55
Message-ID: 005e01bd3875$c8bb7760$fcf3b2c2@caleb..gits.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----Original Message-----
From: Vadim B. Mikheev <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: Maurice Gittens <mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Date: vrijdag 13 februari 1998 18:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks?

>Maurice Gittens wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I have an application which uses posgresql.
>>
>> While testing the system (inserting many records into
>> a database (with large objects) the system ran out of memory
>> (the system has 64M RAM + 128M SWAP). Sorting the processes
>> according to memory usage showed me a postgres process with 160M of
>> memory (+-80%) used.
>

>Version ?
>OS ?
>INSERTs are inside BEGIN/END ? Was -DTBL_FREE_CMD_MEMORY used if YES and
>version is < 6.3 ?
>
>Vadim

Sorry, should have been more complete.

- Postgresql Version: 6.3 (recent (this week) snapshop)
- OS: Linux 2.0.33
- INSERT's are within BEGIN/END brackets
- TBL_FREE_CMD_MEMORY is defined in config.h (I guess it's the default).

Hope this helps.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim B. Mikheev 1998-02-13 12:11:26 Re: [HACKERS] v6.3 snapshot core dump
Previous Message Vadim B. Mikheev 1998-02-13 11:47:26 Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks?