From: | "Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "'Antonin Houska'" <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
Date: | 2018-07-03 11:17:48 |
Message-ID: | 005d01d412bf$79a13ad0$6ce3b070$@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Antonin Houska.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antonin Houska [mailto:ah(at)cybertec(dot)at]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 3:23 PM
> To: Moon, Insung
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
>
> Moon, Insung <Moon_Insung_i3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> This patch seems to implement some of the features you propose, especially encryption of buffers and WAL. I recommend
> you to check so that no effort is
> duplicated:
Yes. encrypting / decrypting between Buffer <-> Disk is the same architecture.
But, this idea is not to encrypt all table, thinks to minimize the performance overhead, only encrypting to necessary tables (including Xlog).
Thank you and Best regards.
Moon.
>
> > [4] Recently discussed mail
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BCSw_tb3bk5i7if6inZFc3yyf%2B
> > 9HEVNTy51QFBoeUk7UE_V%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
>
> --
> Antonin Houska
> Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
> Gröhrmühlgasse 26, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
> Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Moon, Insung | 2018-07-03 11:18:42 | RE: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-03 11:16:55 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |