From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_avd |
Date: | 2003-02-18 08:32:56 |
Message-ID: | 005c01c2d728$56772df0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> - separating the logic for ANALYZE and VACUUM seems like a good idea,
> IMHO. For example, INSERT doesn't create any dead tuples, so it
> shouldn't effect the need to VACUUM in any way -- but enough INSERTs
You mean "affect" :) Sorry - just a grammar nazi :)
> As far as where this belongs, I vote against it going into bin/. It
> isn't polished enough, either in concept or in implementation, to
> deserve that kind of endorsement. But I think putting it into contrib/
> for the next release would be a good idea: if people like it, we can
> take a look at seeing what other features / fine-tuning it needs to
> warrant being part of the official package.
True - I change my vote to /contrib :)
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Olleg Samoylov | 2003-02-18 14:04:19 | Re: pg_avd |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-02-18 08:24:29 | Re: pg_avd |