Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init
Date: 2021-08-02 22:35:13
Message-ID: 005905A1-6CAC-4C25-A08A-E2B8934AA618@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/2/21, 3:12 PM, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I think this is overblown. We already size resources *after*
> shared_preload_libraries' _PG_init() runs, because that's the whole point of
> shared_preload_libraries. What's proposed in this thread is to *disallow*
> increasing resource usage in s_p_l _PG_init(), to make one specific case
> simpler - but it'll actually also make things more complicated, because other
> resources will still only be sized after all of s_p_l has been processed.

True. Perhaps the comments should reference the possibility that a
library will adjust resource usage to explain why
InitializeMaxBackends() is where it is.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-08-02 22:38:19 Re: Make relfile tombstone files conditional on WAL level
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2021-08-02 22:25:56 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)