Performance again

From: "Mihai Gheorghiu" <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Performance again
Date: 2002-09-16 21:05:50
Message-ID: 005601c25dc4$d74cc120$6e646464@New6.Travel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'm still at 7.2.1. I restored the db over the weekend, and I was curious to
see how it behaves, so I ran

select account, sum(amount) from tbas_transactions where isposted and
trxtype = 'MP' group by account;

It took 1 min.
Then I ran

explain analyze select account, sum(amount) from tbas_transactions where
isposted and trxtype = 'MP' group by account;

and I got

psql:mg.txt:1: NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:

Aggregate (cost=12086.32..12094.23 rows=158 width=28) (actual
time=22862.15..26451.23 rows=16643 loops=1)
-> Group (cost=12086.32..12090.27 rows=1582 width=28) (actual
time=22861.92..25394.47 rows=345573 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=12086.32..12086.32 rows=1582 width=28) (actual
time=22861.90..23652.72 rows=345573 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using trx_trxtype_idx on tbas_transactions
(cost=0.00..12002.25 rows=1582 width=28) (actual time=0.48..5209.36
rows=345573 loops=1)
Total runtime: 26575.85 msec

EXPLAIN

That's back to the time it used to take in 7.1.3
I notice a discrepancy between the number of rows reported in the two parts
(cost vs. actual). I also wonder what happens between 5209 and 22861 msec
(which may be my real problem).
Then I ran

vacuum verbose analyze tbas_transactions;

and I got

psql:mg2.txt:1: NOTICE: --Relation tbas_transactions--
psql:mg2.txt:1: NOTICE: Pages 14965: Changed 0, Empty 0; Tup 632852: Vac 0,
Keep 0, UnUsed 0.
Total CPU 0.96s/0.13u sec elapsed 1.30 sec.
psql:mg2.txt:1: NOTICE: --Relation pg_toast_17242--
psql:mg2.txt:1: NOTICE: Pages 0: Changed 0, Empty 0; Tup 0: Vac 0, Keep 0,
UnUsed 0.
Total CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
psql:mg2.txt:1: NOTICE: Analyzing tbas_transactions
VACUUM

After that, the run time for the query became 22.3s (not enough improvement
over what
explain analyze came up with).

Looking forward to your comments,

Mihai

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-09-16 21:24:57 Re: A question on performance
Previous Message Ericson Smith 2002-09-16 21:01:29 Re: Physical sites handling large data