From: | "Mattias Kregert" <mattias(at)kregert(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | "Ron Mayer" <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres server crash |
Date: | 2006-11-20 22:36:06 |
Message-ID: | 004f01c70cf4$4565ee10$6e00a8c0@SLUGGO |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
if [ `cat /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory` == 0 ]; then
echo "WARNING: Watch out for the oom-killer! Consider echo 2 >
/proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory"
fi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Mayer" <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: Postgres server crash
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> writes:
>>> Here's something I found googling for "memory overcommitment"+linux
>>> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2000-04/0512.html
>>
>> That might have been right when it was written (note the reference to a
>> 2.2 Linux kernel), but it's 100% wrong now. 0 is the default, not-safe
>> setting.
>
> Is this something we could detect and show a warning for at initdb
> time; or perhaps log a warning in the log files at postmaster startup?
> This dangerous choice of settings seems to catch quite a few postgresql
> users.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jérôme BENOIS | 2006-11-21 09:21:29 | BitMapScan performance degradation |
Previous Message | Craig A. James | 2006-11-20 06:42:07 | Re: Postgres server crash |