Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test

From: "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
Date: 2003-10-28 21:51:10
Message-ID: 004e01c39d9d$9a16aef0$0700a8c0@trogdor
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> writes:
> >> "we have no portable means of expressing that exact constraint to the
> >> kernel"
> > Does this mean that specific operating systems have a better way of
dealing
> > with this? Which ones and how?
>
> I'm not aware of any that offer a way of expressing "write these
> particular blocks before those particular blocks". It doesn't seem like
> it would require rocket scientists to devise such an API, but no one's
> got round to it yet. Part of the problem is that the issue would have
> to be approached at multiple levels: there is no point in offering an
> OS-level API for this when the hardware underlying the bus-level API
> (IDE) is doing its level best to sabotage the entire semantics.

But for those of us using scsi wouldn't it be possible to get a performance
gain here? Would the gain be worth the effort?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-10-29 01:33:37 Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
Previous Message Lynn.Tilby 2003-10-28 20:42:20 Attribute 'rtrim' is repeated