Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xact.c xlog.c)

From: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
To: <devik(at)cdi(dot)cz>
Cc: "'Tatsuo Ishii'" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xact.c xlog.c)
Date: 2000-11-19 19:26:56
Message-ID: 004d01c0525e$aec62ac0$b97a30d0@sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Ok, so with CHECKPOINTS, we could move the offline log files to
> > > somewhere else so that we could archive them, in my
> > > undertstanding. Now question is, how we could recover from disaster
> > > like losing every table files except log files. Can we do this with
> > > WAL? If so, how can we do it?
> >
> > Not currently. WAL based BAR is required. I think there will be no BAR
> > in 7.1, but it may be added in 7.1.X (no initdb will be required).
> > Anyway BAR implementation is not in my plans. All in your hands, guys -:)
> >
> > Vadim
>
> Cam I ask what BAR is ?

Backup And Restore.

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-11-19 19:31:15 psql: anyone ever notice?
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 2000-11-19 19:23:19 Re: WAL fsync scheduling