From: | "Miguel Juan" <mjuan(at)cibal(dot)es> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unicode support |
Date: | 2005-09-01 09:05:35 |
Message-ID: | 004c01c5aed4$50fffa60$07c8a8c0@Miguel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Miguel Juan" <mjuan(at)cibal(dot)es>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: [ODBC] Unicode support
Yes please - attached.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miguel Juan [mailto:mjuan(at)cibal(dot)es]
> Sent: 01 September 2005 09:25
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Unicode support
>
> hello,
>
> I will try it with BDE environment if you want.
>
> Regards,
>
> Miguel Juan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
> To: "Anoop Kumar" <anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com>
> Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:36 PM
> Subject: [ODBC] Unicode support
>
>
> Hi Anoop and anyone else who might be interested,
>
> I've been thinking about how the Unicode support might be improved to
> allow the old 07.xx non-unicode style behaviour to work for those that
> need it. At them moment, when we connect using on of the wide connect
> functions, the CC->unicode flag is set to true. This only
> affects a few
> options, such as pgtype_to_concise_type()'s mapping of PG types to SQL
> types.
>
> It seems to me that perhaps we should set CC->unicode = 1, only upon
> connection to a Unicode database. Anything else, we leave it
> set to 0 so
> that it always maps varchars etc to ANSI types, and handles other
> encodings in single byte or non-unicode multibyte mode (which worked
> fine in 07.xx where those encodings where appropriate, such as SJIS in
> Japan). This should also help BDE based apps, which further
> research has
> shown me are broken with Unicode columns in SQL Server and Oracle as
> well as PostgreSQL (search unicode + BDE on Google Groups for more).
>
> Am I seeing a possible improvement where in fact there isn't one, or
> missing some obvious downside?
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-09-01 09:11:10 | Re: Unicode support |
Previous Message | Miguel Juan | 2005-09-01 08:24:54 | Re: Unicode support |