| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
| Date: | 2003-09-19 23:38:42 |
| Message-ID: | 004c01c37f07$29610a70$3d283ddb@PbgX |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >> Log message:
> >> Seems like a bad idea that REINDEX TABLE supports (or
> >> thinks it does)
> >> reindexing system tables without ignoring system
> >> indexes,
>
> > Why ?
>
> I'd ask the question the other way: why would it be a good
> idea to allow
> this in REINDEX TABLE and not in the other two cases? And
> did it really
> work?
Yes. I would revert your change.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 23:57:31 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 23:31:27 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 23:57:31 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 23:31:27 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 23:57:31 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-19 23:31:27 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |