Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact

From: "Gnanakumar" <gnanam(at)zoniac(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact
Date: 2010-03-27 13:00:09
Message-ID: 004701cacdad$7013e9f0$503bbdd0$@com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance

Hi,

We're using PostgreSQL 8.2. Recently, in our production database, there was
a severe performance impact.. Even though, we're regularly doing both:

1. VACUUM FULL ANALYZE once in a week during low-usage time and

2. ANALYZE everyday at low-usage time

Also, we noticed that the physical database size has grown upto 30 GB. But,
if I dump the database in the form of SQL and import it locally in my
machine, it was only 3.2 GB. Then while searching in Google to optimize
database size, I found the following useful link:

http://www.linuxinsight.com/optimize_postgresql_database_size.html

It says that even vacuumdb or reindexdb doesn't really compact database
size, only dump/restore does because of MVCC architecture feature in
PostgreSQL and this has been proven here.

So, finally we decided to took our production database offline and performed
dump/restore. After this, the physical database size has also reduced from
30 GB to 3.5 GB and the performance was also very good than it was before.

Physical database size was found using the following command:

du -sh /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/<database-oid>

I also cross-checked this size using
"pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size(datname))".

Questions

1. Is there any version/update of PostgreSQL addressing this issue?

2. How in real time, this issues are handled by other PostgreSQL users
without taking to downtime?

3. Any ideas or links whether this is addressed in upcoming PostgreSQL
version 9.0 release?

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre C 2010-03-27 13:35:15 Re: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact
Previous Message Dai, Tino 2010-03-26 04:40:18 Re: Questions about moving a restoring a dump from 8.1.11 to 8.2.16

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre C 2010-03-27 13:35:15 Re: Database size growing over time and leads to performance impact
Previous Message Craig James 2010-03-27 00:25:41 Re: why does swap not recover?