From: | "Darko Prenosil" <Darko(dot)Prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Gibson" <gibsonm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump as a bunch of PostgreSQL functions |
Date: | 2004-09-14 14:47:11 |
Message-ID: | 004501c49a69$bd9a5bf0$b796bfd5@darko |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yes, IMHO this looks like a god idea. I planed to do something like that,
but to return some kind of description language (XML for example),so restore
could decide at runtime what exactly to do with that metadata ( depending on
what user wants - create database or not, create users or not, reset
serializators or not, replace existing objects or just create objects that
are not existing at database, even do a "pgpatch" on existing objects), but
this needs more time than I currently have :-(
I still hope I'll do it some day...
Regards !
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Mark Gibson" <gibsonm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump as a bunch of PostgreSQL functions
> > Would this be practical, would it be possible to break the pg_dump
> > code out into PostgreSQL functions?
> >
> > Anyone have any ideas/thoughts/suggestions on this?
>
> It's been my plan for sometime, I'm time-starved at the moment however.
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-14 14:55:46 | Re: pg_restore segfault with pg-CVS |
Previous Message | strk | 2004-09-14 14:27:37 | Re: pg_restore segfault with pg-CVS |