From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Robert Haas'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP patch for Todo Item : Provide fallback_application_name in contrib/pgbench, oid2name, and dblink |
Date: | 2012-06-13 14:06:41 |
Message-ID: | 004301cd496d$c238d5e0$46aa81a0$@kapila@huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I have created the patch by including fallback_application_name for dblink
as well.
In this I have used the name of fallback_application_name as dblink.
Please let me know your suggestions regarding the same.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:13 AM
To: Amit Kapila
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch for Todo Item : Provide
fallback_application_name in contrib/pgbench, oid2name, and dblink
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
> As per the previous discussion in link below, it seems that fallback
> application name needs to be provided for only
>
> pgbench and oid2name.
>
>
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/w2g9837222c1004070216u3bc46b3ahbdd
fdffdbfb46212(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>
>
>
> However the title of Todo Item suggests it needs to be done for dblink as
> well.
>
> Please suggest if it needs to be done for dblink, if yes then what should
be
> fallback_application_name for it?
Why not 'dblink'?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fallback_application_name.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-06-13 14:21:12 | Re: [PATCH 16/16] current version of the design document |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-06-13 14:02:46 | Re: hint bit i/o reduction |