From: | "Guoping Zhang" <guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "'Guillaume Smet'" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Guoping Zhang (E-mail)'" <guopingz(at)nstc(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql |
Date: | 2006-04-28 05:18:08 |
Message-ID: | 004301c66a83$234bd470$74304c93@eddy |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Guillaume,
Thanks for the reply.
I am using wal_sync_methods be open_datasync, which appear much faster than
'fdatasync'.
Regards,
Guoping
-----Original Message-----
From: Guillaume Smet [mailto:guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: 2006Äê4ÔÂ27ÈÕ 19:26
To: guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org; Guoping Zhang (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting
fsync OFF for postgresql
Guoping,
On 4/27/06, Guoping Zhang <guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> We have to looking at setting fsync OFF option for performance reason,
Did you try the other wal sync methods (fdatasync in particular)? I
saw a few posts lately explaining how changing sync method can affect
performances in specific cases.
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guoping Zhang | 2006-04-28 05:58:06 | Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-28 05:05:48 | Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync |