From: | "Nikhil G(dot) Daddikar" <ngd(at)iname(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Nathan Barnett" <nbarnett(at)cellularphones(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reliability Stability of PgSQL & it's JDBC driver |
Date: | 2000-12-13 08:20:32 |
Message-ID: | 004101c064de$2c6aadc0$0400a8c0@darkstar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Nathan,
Thanks for your response. It is great to know that Postgres is working out
fine. However, I don't understand what "Vaccum of the DB" means nor what
the "WAL" functionality is. If you could briefly explain these, that would
be great.
Thanks again!
-ngd.
> The main problem that you have in a production system is the VACUUM of the
database.
> This will in most cases severely inhibit performance. If your system
isn't
> 24x7, then you should be fine as you can schedule this for off times. I
> believe that the need to vacuum the database will be removed in the next
> version due to WAL functionality, but I'm sure someone else is better
> qualified to explain that. I just wanted to vouch for the stability of
> Postgres in a production environment.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Trewern, Ben | 2000-12-13 11:31:15 | RE: info please |
Previous Message | Laurentiu Drob | 2000-12-13 08:13:20 | Re: Postgres failover implementation |