From: | "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why overlaps is not working |
Date: | 2006-11-11 20:26:33 |
Message-ID: | 003a01c705d1$70bfa4e0$6207eb50@acer |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I am not sure if this would work for you, but instead of using NULL to
> represent infinity, why not
> use 'infinity' to represent infinity?
Infinity dehaves differenty than ordinal dates and nulls.
If both b and d are infinity then comparison fails:
select timestamp 'infinity':: date<=timestamp 'infinity':: date
returns null.
So infinity introduces third kind of FUD in addition to usual date and
null comparisons. NULLs in SQL are disaster. With infinity SQL is double
disaster.
In samples I used DATE '999993112' but this is incorrect.
I must use maximum allowed date or max_timestamp casted to date.
Is it reasonable to use it ?
I hope that MAX_DATE <= MAX_DATE returns true.
Which is the value of MAX_DATE is Postgres ?
Andrus.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrus | 2006-11-11 20:32:06 | Re: Why overlaps is not working |
Previous Message | Rick Schumeyer | 2006-11-11 19:45:00 | encoding advice requested |