From: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: disk performance benchmarks |
Date: | 2004-09-15 09:39:42 |
Message-ID: | 003801c49b07$f33b6990$ad01a8c0@zaphod |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> Current issue:
>
> A dual 64-bit Opteron 244 machine with 8GB main memory, two 4-disk RAID5
> arrays (one for database, one for xlogs). PG's config is extremely
> generous, and in isolated benchmarks it's very fast.
It depends on the controller, but usually I would expect a better
performance if xlogs are just on a two-disk mirror and the rest of the disks
for data (6 splindles instead of 4 then).
I don't think RAID5 is a benefit for xlogs.
Regards,
Michael Paesold
> But, in reality, performance is abyssmal. There's something about what
> PG does inside commits and checkpoints that sends Linux into a catatonic
> state. For instance here's a snapshot of vmstat during a parallel heavy
> select/insert load:
...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Katsaros Kwn/nos | 2004-09-15 11:01:38 | Problems with SPI memory management |
Previous Message | Vincent.Desloges | 2004-09-15 09:14:29 | support on postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-09-15 15:15:50 | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2004-09-15 09:16:44 | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |