Re: disk performance benchmarks

From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: disk performance benchmarks
Date: 2004-09-15 09:39:42
Message-ID: 003801c49b07$f33b6990$ad01a8c0@zaphod
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:

> Current issue:
>
> A dual 64-bit Opteron 244 machine with 8GB main memory, two 4-disk RAID5
> arrays (one for database, one for xlogs). PG's config is extremely
> generous, and in isolated benchmarks it's very fast.

It depends on the controller, but usually I would expect a better
performance if xlogs are just on a two-disk mirror and the rest of the disks
for data (6 splindles instead of 4 then).

I don't think RAID5 is a benefit for xlogs.

Regards,
Michael Paesold

> But, in reality, performance is abyssmal. There's something about what
> PG does inside commits and checkpoints that sends Linux into a catatonic
> state. For instance here's a snapshot of vmstat during a parallel heavy
> select/insert load:
...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Katsaros Kwn/nos 2004-09-15 11:01:38 Problems with SPI memory management
Previous Message Vincent.Desloges 2004-09-15 09:14:29 support on postgres

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-09-15 15:15:50 Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2004-09-15 09:16:44 Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --