From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Josh Berkus'" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Boszormenyi Zoltan'" <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'Robert Haas'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]) |
Date: | 2013-06-19 05:58:26 |
Message-ID: | 003501ce6cb2$0509f440$0f1ddcc0$@kapila@huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:25 PM Josh Berkus wrote:
> Amit,
>
> > I think, the decision of name, we can leave to committer with below
> > possibilities,
> > as it is very difficult to build consensus on any particular name.
> >
> > Auto.conf
> > System.auto.conf
> > Postgresql.auto.conf
> > Persistent.auto.conf
>
> Reasons for "auto.conf" as a choice above all of the previous:
>
> 1) short
> 2) significantly different from "postgresql.conf"
What is the advantage to keep name significantly different from "postgresql.conf",
rather will it be not helpful for use if it is similar to "postgresql.conf"?
> 3) near the beginning of the alphabet, so it should sort near the top
> if
> there are other files in conf/ directory
How would user correlate auto.conf contains configuration parameters set by Alter System command?
I had kept persistent.auto.conf based on suggestion in this thread that user can easily correlate it with
SET PERSISTENT command.
So based on that theory I think it would be better to name it as System.auto.conf or Postgresql.auto.conf
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Svenne Krap | 2013-06-19 06:00:19 | Re: Git-master regression failure |
Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2013-06-19 05:57:02 | Re: Patch for removng unused targets |