From: | "Donald Fraser" <demolish(at)cwgsy(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "[ADMIN]" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall |
Date: | 2003-02-20 10:46:03 |
Message-ID: | 003401c2d8cd$48fcaf50$1664a8c0@DEMOLITION |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Donald Fraser wrote:
>
> > PostgreSQL 7.3.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
> >
> > I issue the following command:
> > CREATE DATABASE "CISX" WITH OWNER = postgres TEMPLATE = template1
ENCODING = 'SQL_ASCII';
> >
> > When I do a backup from the database using pg_dumpall (with no command
line options) it creates the following:
> > CREATE DATABASE "CISX" WITH OWNER = postgres TEMPLATE = template0
ENCODING = 'SQL_ASCII';
> >
> > I don't know whether this is a bug or not as I can't find any hard
documentation to say otherwise?
>
> I'd guess not, because the objects you copied from template1 when making
> the database are part of the dumpall output. If you made it from
> template1 after the backup you'd get anything that was in the new
> template1 plus all of the old objects.
>
>
Ok I understand now... I haven't been using template1 with non-pg_catalog
objects.
My question now would be, is there an easy way to place your own objects
into pg_catalog for template0? (In advance of why... it is much easier to
apply any upgrades / patches to my own customisations when they are not
backed up into the standard backup - otherwise you have to manually edit the
backup file which is much harder to do than apply a patch to the template.)
Regards Donald
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Monica Robustelli | 2003-02-20 10:52:25 | Insert Error |
Previous Message | Ganesan R | 2003-02-20 09:27:20 | PANIC: unable to locate a valid checkpoint record |