From: | "David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Carlos Fuentes'" <caf(at)rentrakmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: unnest with generate_subscripts and same array |
Date: | 2011-05-27 00:58:57 |
Message-ID: | 003101cc1c09$42b39310$c81ab930$@yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Can't speak to guarantees but arrays, unlike tuples / rows, are inherently
ordered and so any operation that decomposes/iterates them will do so in the
internal order.
So, yes.
(without looking at code)
But, since you do not have an "ORDER BY on table_with_array_col" so the
order in which rows are returned from table_with_array_col is undefined.
Better to write:
SELECT unnest(array_col), generate_subscripts(array_col)
FROM (
SELECT array_col FROM table_with_array_col ORDER BY somefield
) sub
David J.
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Carlos Fuentes
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:17 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] unnest with generate_subscripts and same array
Hello,
Given that these are the only one array_col in play, is
select unnest(array_col), generate_subscripts(array_col) from
table_with_array_col ;
guaranteed to gave the subscripts match the array element? In all the
testing I've done it's worked, but I don't know if I was just lucky :)
Thanks,
-Carlos Fuentes
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasen Betts | 2011-05-27 03:53:16 | Re: 500KB PDF saving into large object , what is the table size? |
Previous Message | Carlos Fuentes | 2011-05-27 00:17:06 | unnest with generate_subscripts and same array |