Re: transactions, serial ids, and JDBC

From: "Peter Gibbs" <peter(at)emkel(dot)co(dot)za>
To: <gss+pg(at)cs(dot)brown(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL general mailing list" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transactions, serial ids, and JDBC
Date: 2002-08-08 06:56:50
Message-ID: 003101c23ea8$c5473040$0b01010a@emkel.co.za
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Gregory Seidman wrote:

> On second thought, is there any reason not to put the whole transaction
> into a function? Will it still act as a transaction? And do I have to use
> plpgsql or is there a way to store a variable (i.e. the ids I need) using
> straight SQL?

A function will always be executed within transaction context. You don't
actually need any variables for this:

create function abc(int,int,int) returns int as '
insert into a (somedata) values ($1);
insert into b (moredata, a_id) values ($2, currval(''a_id_seq''));
insert into c (yetmoredata, b_id) values ($3, currval(''b_id_seq''));
select currval(''a_id_seq'')::int;
' language sql;

If your real tables have more fields, you may hit the limit on the number of
parameters allowed in a function call - search the archives to see how you
can change that limit if you need to.

--
Peter Gibbs
EmKel Systems

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario Weilguni 2002-08-08 06:57:06 any way to check if a transaction is active?
Previous Message rolf.ostvik 2002-08-08 05:07:55 Re: SQL statement to set next serial value to max of a table?