From: | "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dry Run Mode, + W9X |
Date: | 2004-09-19 20:33:25 |
Message-ID: | 003001c49e87$ee0fc140$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Sent: September 19, 2004 2:17 PM
> > Nonetheless, Dave Page built 9X binaries for 1.0.2, which work perfectly okay
> > for me. Another reason is the registry usage, but as I said, I want to
> > avoid the use of registry in the dry run mode altogether.
>
> Our project doesn't contain non-unicode support any more.
Oops. I guess that passed by me unnoticed. :(
> > So, if I address the caveats and other issues that come up and
> > if the change is not too invasive, I have some chances for the
> > work to be applied when I contribute it?
>
> Yes, but not before 1.2 release (which will not take too much time)
Of course not as I said in my original post. And the feature freeze
is taking place.
> It will be hard work:
> - many comboboxes are filled from db, you might even force uncatched
> errors here.
> - some (few) strings are exchanged at runtime. First that comes to my
> mind is "Users/Groups" on the privileges tab, selectable by "display
> users in privileges". You could scan for CTRL_STATIC in the sources.
It's okay. Life is not easy either. Thanks for the pointers!
> Regards,
> Andreas
-s
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2004-09-19 21:42:40 | Unicode support on W9x |
Previous Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2004-09-19 20:27:54 | Necessity of wxstd.po |