From: | "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)venux(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speaking of Indexing... (Text indexing) |
Date: | 2001-04-11 15:33:06 |
Message-ID: | 003001c0c29c$b46b6e00$0b51000a@epox450 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Hmm. I'm pretty sure that a single index on the entire contents of a
> resume *as a single field* is close to useless. And an index on an 8k
> piece is also useless. Presumably you really want an index covering each
> significant word of each resume, in which case you would not run into
> the 4k limit (or 2k limit? it is documented somewhere) on the size of an
> *index* field (which is still a limitation on PostgreSQL built with the
> standard 8k block size. Of course, you can build with a larger block
> size).
Just an FYI..
I asked the other day and someone (Tom?) told me it was about 2k..
-Mitch
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Fitzmyers | 2001-04-11 15:53:50 | RE: newbie question - INSERT |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-11 15:22:47 | Re: run both 7.0.3 and 7.1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Eric Cuendet | 2001-04-11 15:49:00 | Postgres & Kerberos |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-11 15:18:33 | Re: Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can't import to v7.1? |