From: | "Mike Sears" <msears(at)vianet(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: random() function produces wrong range |
Date: | 2000-08-01 22:26:36 |
Message-ID: | 002b01bffc07$907fd2d0$02945bd1@neutrino |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
What build of postgres is this running on. I've tried this on 6x and it
doesn't seem to work.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>; <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] random() function produces wrong range
> Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> > Actually, on my machines, both man pages for rand() and random() say
> > they return values between 0 and RAND_MAX (whether that's true or not
> > is another matter). In my case RAND_MAX==INT_MAX so the change wouldn't
> > be a problem, but it might be problematic on some of the 64 bit
machines.
>
> Oh, that's interesting. What platform do you use? If RAND_MAX applies
> to random() on some machines that'd probably explain why the code is
> written like it is. But on my box (HPUX) the rand() function is old
> and crufty and considerably different from random().
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KMiller | 2000-08-01 22:55:15 | 1763 pq_flush messages |
Previous Message | Tim Uckun | 2000-08-01 21:27:24 | Linking views and tables to access. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-08-01 23:12:02 | Re: pg_dump & ownership (again) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-01 21:23:53 | Re: Anyone care about type "filename" ? |