| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Date: | 2003-06-20 01:20:13 |
| Message-ID: | 002a01c336ca$19fc1370$2800a8c0@mars |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> We have a lot of pretty good stuff. You're not happy that the
> performance of IN (subselect) has been fixed?
All our code uses workaround now :)
> That btree index bloat is
> fixed (at least in large part, it remains to be seen whether the field
> performance is all that we need...)?
Yes, that's a good feature.
> We can't slip this puppy any more --- it's time to wrap her up and
> push her out.
OK, let's do it - we've got full support for it in phpPgAdmin already :)
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-20 01:21:22 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-20 01:20:02 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |