From: | "Anand B Kumar" <akumar(at)addr(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Please clarify with regard to Renaming a Sequence |
Date: | 2003-03-24 04:20:44 |
Message-ID: | 002801c2f1bc$bfcb1ba0$9700a8c0@blraddrcom |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Dear Dave,
Thanx a lot for your help. But still, the doubt lies, whether we can change
the property of a table which has bulk recods on it!!! Does pgsql support
that?? Even though u alter the name of the sequence, we need to change the
sequence name ( meaning the property in the default field) in the altered
table also, which should now point to the new altered sequence.
Please advice
thanx
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Cramer" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: "Anand B Kumar" <akumar(at)addr(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Please clarify with regard to Renaming a Sequence
> >From what I can see the sequence name is not changed when you rename a
> table
>
> test=# alter table fooseq rename to fooseq1;
> ALTER TABLE
> test=# \d fooseq1
> Table "public.fooseq1"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> --------+---------+-------------------------------------------------------
-
> id | integer | not null default
> nextval('public.fooseq_id_seq'::text)
>
> so everything should work as expected.
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 09:38, Anand B Kumar wrote:
> > Dear Sirs,
> >
> > We are working on Postgresql for one of our on going project. We have
> > come across a situation as mentioned below.
> >
> > 1. We have to create a table with sequence dynamically from the front
> > end ( through a JSP code)
> > 2. An option for the user is given to change the name of the table in
> > the front end. During this process, we change the name of the table
> > and its relative sequence too. But the table which was first created
> > with a sequence has its property written in its property field. Now
> > if we change that property in that field, will the sequence gets
> > disturbed??
> >
> > For say, I create a table 'addrtech' which has two fields, empid and
> > empname
> > 2. The emp id has a sequence created dynamically. so a sequence
> > name addrtech_empid_seq is created.
> > 3. The field empid in addrtech has in its DEFAULT column as
> > " nextval('"addrtech_empid_seq"'::text) "
> > 4. Now I rename addrtech to addrtechnology
> > 5. So the table is altered
> > 6. The sequence is also altered as addrtechnology_empid_seq and the
> > new table is addrtechnology
> >
> > But the doubt now is the field which has the sequence i.e the empid
> > which has nextval('"addrtech_empid_seq"'::text) . The property if
> > changed to nextval('"addrtechnology_empid_seq"'::text) will the
> > seqeunce remain the same. Meaning if it had some few million records
> > in the orginial table addrtech and if additional data is entere to
> > addrtechnology will the sequence continue.
> >
> > Please clarify this query of mine at the earliest so that we can
> > incorporate the same in our codes
> >
> >
> > Your early reply is solicitated
> >
> > regards
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Upgrade Your Email - Click here!
> --
> Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
> Cramer Consulting
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gary M | 2003-03-24 04:32:21 | Re: From a real novice |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-03-24 04:12:11 | Re: FW: [NOVICE] From a real novice |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Zak | 2003-03-24 08:40:46 | Re: to_char(interval) --- done? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-03-24 03:56:04 | Anti-Spam and upgrades ... testing ... |